New Hybrid Eucalyptus discovered in the Pacific Northwest
Barclay's Hybrid Eucalyptus crenulata x nitens found in the USA
Gustavo Iglesias Trabado
GIT Forestry Consulting - Consultoría y Servicios de Ingeniería Agroforestal - www.git-forestry.com - EUCALYPTOLOGICS
GIT Forestry Consulting - Consultoría y Servicios de Ingeniería Agroforestal - www.git-forestry.com - EUCALYPTOLOGICS
We have already discussed in EUCALYPTOLOGICS some examples of Eucalyptus hybrids as E. urograndis (E. urophylla x grandis), E. gundal (E. gunnii x dalrympleana) or E. nitobulus (E. nitens x globulus). Many other examples exist as a result of natural crosses in their native Australian habitats or as an indirect result of human activity after planting compatible trees overseas and letting them cross-breed. For the last 100 years growers have been periodically reporting such cases from the four corners of the world. And today we report what seems to be a new hybrid case: Eucalyptus crenulata x nitens!
Hybrid Eucalyptus Identification: 4 main considerations
For the case of this probable hybrid strain we have the following morphologic clues:1) Close Cousins or not: Taxonomic Distance
2) Bee-Made or Man-Made? Checking Habitat Overlap
3) Measure the Beast: Comparative Botanical Diagnosis
- Eucalyptus crenulata Blakely & de Beuzevill. [1939]: Subtribe Eucalyptinae, Genus Eucalyptus, Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Maidenaria, Series Neglectae, Subseries Crenulatosae
- Eucalyptus nitens (H. Deane & Maiden) Maiden [1913]: Subtribe Eucalyptinae, Genus Eucalyptus, Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Maidenaria, Series Globulares, Subseries Nitentosae
- Hybrid category: Intra-sectional (Maidenaria), Inter-serial (Neglectae x Globulares)
- Hybridism rank: Common. There are many known examples of natural and man-made Eucalyptus hybrids using species of two different Series within Section Maidenaria.
- Hybridism rank: Common. There are many known examples of natural and man-made Eucalyptus hybrids using species of two different Series within Section Maidenaria.
2) Bee-Made or Man-Made? Checking Habitat Overlap
Eucalyptus crenulata is an endemic species present in just two tiny wild populations in South Central Victoria. Here it survives as part of plant communities where E. ovata, E. viminalis, E. camphora and E. radiata are the only eucalypts sharing its habitat.
E. nitens has a more widespread natural distribution in the highlands of Central Victoria and further North along the Great Dividing Range into New South Wales. Both species share a somewhat close geographic distribution in Central Victoria but their habitats do not overlap and there is clear reproductive isolation between both gene pools. This means natural hybrids between E. crenulata and E. nitens are not possible in the wild. Hybrid strains can only originate from cross-pollination between compatible parent trees of closely related species planted in some other location.
E. nitens has a more widespread natural distribution in the highlands of Central Victoria and further North along the Great Dividing Range into New South Wales. Both species share a somewhat close geographic distribution in Central Victoria but their habitats do not overlap and there is clear reproductive isolation between both gene pools. This means natural hybrids between E. crenulata and E. nitens are not possible in the wild. Hybrid strains can only originate from cross-pollination between compatible parent trees of closely related species planted in some other location.
3) Measure the Beast: Comparative Botanical Diagnosis
One of the most useful parameters to aid Eucalyptus species identification is a detailed study of their reproductive organs: flower buds, flowers and seed capsules. Their numbers, shapes and sizes are key to assist taxonomic study and accurate diagnosis.
- Lightly crenulate glaucous juvenile leaves (E. crenulata trait, see Fig. 1)
- Verrucose non aristate glaucous juvenile stems (E. crenulata trait, see Fig. 1)
- Distinctively beaked flower buds (E. crenulata trait, see Fig. 1)
- Barrel shaped non globose glossy green flower buds (non E. crenulata trait, should be glaucous)
- Flower buds and seed capsules in groups of 7 or lower numbers (non E. crenulata trait, should be in groups of 11 or more)
- Early transition from sessile orbicular juvenile leaves to opposite stalked falcate leaves before reproductive maturity (non E. crenulata trait, should not show transition to adult foliage)
4) Ask the Parents: Ancestry of the Cultivated Strain
Are you wondering why the "Get to know as much as possible about seed provenance before planting an Eucalyptus" mantra is a good one? Because when a case like this arises, morphology is not enough!
Going further, seed provenance is not enough. Traceability to the original parent trees for at least a couple of generations might be needed. Detective work.
For this case we are lucky enough as to trace back the seed originating this curious specimen to E. crenulata trees planted ex situ from its natural habitat. In this particular location at least another Eucalyptus species grows which could provide all those traits observed as non E. crenulata. And that species is E. nitens (see Fig. 2).
Why Eucalyptus Botany is seldom an easy task
Discussed above, a strange looking eucalypt for which we have followed early and adult growth until reproductive maturity, which allowed observation of apparent intermediate characters between a clear E. crenulata ancestry (verrucose juvenile stems, crenulate juvenile leaf margins, beaked flower buds) and another eucalypt species bearing flower buds and seed capsules in groups of 7, having orbicular juvenile leaves, falcate adult leaves and barrel shaped capsules.
Detective work yielded nice clues of the other parent in this mix being E. nitens, which, as far as we know, would mean a first detailed record of the hybrid strain E. crenulata x nitens, making Barclay's Hybrid an unique specimen and a nice contribution to genecological studies in Genus Eucalyptus.
But...
"At this subpopulation, the mature Buxton Gums are thought to be hybrids between E. crenulata and E. ovata (Adams & Simmons 2000), and the characteristics of individual trees may not be entirely consistent with the species description in the botanical literature (Blakely & de Beuzeville 1939). Hybridisation between related Eucalyptus species is common and widely documented (Pryor & Johnson 1971, 1981; Griffin et al. 1988). Undoubtedly the exchange of genetic material facilitated by hybridisation has been important in the evolution of this large genus (Potts & Wiltshire 1997). (...) Most of the wild ‘Buxton Gums’ at this site are now thought to be introgressed hybrids between E. ovata and E. crenulata (Simmons & Parsons 1976; Adams & Simmons 2000). A limited number of ‘pure’ E. crenulata were recorded from the site in the 1970s (Simmons & Parsons 1976) and early 1980s (Albrecht 1983). However, pure breeding E. crenulata are thought to be no longer present (Adams & Simmons 2000). Genetic analysis of the population is required to confirm this."
Detective work yielded nice clues of the other parent in this mix being E. nitens, which, as far as we know, would mean a first detailed record of the hybrid strain E. crenulata x nitens, making Barclay's Hybrid an unique specimen and a nice contribution to genecological studies in Genus Eucalyptus.
But...
"At this subpopulation, the mature Buxton Gums are thought to be hybrids between E. crenulata and E. ovata (Adams & Simmons 2000), and the characteristics of individual trees may not be entirely consistent with the species description in the botanical literature (Blakely & de Beuzeville 1939). Hybridisation between related Eucalyptus species is common and widely documented (Pryor & Johnson 1971, 1981; Griffin et al. 1988). Undoubtedly the exchange of genetic material facilitated by hybridisation has been important in the evolution of this large genus (Potts & Wiltshire 1997). (...) Most of the wild ‘Buxton Gums’ at this site are now thought to be introgressed hybrids between E. ovata and E. crenulata (Simmons & Parsons 1976; Adams & Simmons 2000). A limited number of ‘pure’ E. crenulata were recorded from the site in the 1970s (Simmons & Parsons 1976) and early 1980s (Albrecht 1983). However, pure breeding E. crenulata are thought to be no longer present (Adams & Simmons 2000). Genetic analysis of the population is required to confirm this."
White M.; Murphy A. H. & Downe J. (2006)
No matter what, an unique plant!
The previous excerpt points to more detective work needed. Suddendly, Ian's Hybrid has become one of three potential very rare Eucalyptus:
- A first record of E. crenulata x nitens
- A first record of E. ovata x crenulata in North America
- A first record of (E. ovata x crenulata) x nitens
So maybe the thing to do now is a Spaniard annoying some Australian about an Eucalyptus growing in the United States. Aren't these amusing International Plants?
References
Ian Barclay (BSc Hort. WSU) has been growing rare plants since last century and scattering them all over Washington State (USA) and elsewhere. Among other things he has trialled over 130 species of Eucalyptus trees in the Pacific Northwest as an endeavour to obtain a range of forms and provenances of horticultural merit and to obtain select trees for superior performance and cold-hardiness, which is the most important effort in Eucalyptoculture for Northwestern America since the days of Stan Gessel.
References
- White M.; Murphy A. H. & Downe J. (2006) National Recovery Plan for the Buxton Gum Eucalyptus crenulata. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria.
- Adams, R. & Simmons, D. (2000) Survival, health and recruitment of Eucalyptus crenulata (Buxton Gum) - Base line data and monitoring guidelines. Unpublished report to the Upper Goulburn Field Naturalists and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Funded under the Threatened Species Network Community Grant Scheme. NRE, Alexandra.
- Blakely, W.F. & de Beuzeville, W.A.W. (1939) Contributions from the New South Wales National Herbarium 1: p. 37.
- Pryor, L.D. & Johnson, L.A.S. (1971) A classification of the Eucalypts. Australian National University Press, Canberra.
- Pryor, L.D. and Johnson, L.A.S. (1981) Eucalyptus, the universal Australian. In Ecological Biogeography of Australia. (Ed A. Keast). Dr W Junk, The Hague.
- Griffin, A.R.; Burgess, I.P. & Wolf, L. (1988) Patterns of natural and manipulated hybridisation in the genus Eucalyptus L’Herit.–a review. Australian Journal of Botany 36: 44–61.
- Potts. B.M. & Wiltshire, R.J.E. (1997) Eucalypt genetics and genecology. In Eucalypt Ecology. Eds: J.E. Williams and J.C.Z. Woinarsky. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Simmons, D. & Parsons, R. F. (1976) Analysis of a hybrid swarm involving Eucalyptus crenulata and E. ovata using leaf oils and morphology. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 4: 97–101.
- Albrecht, D.E. (1983) Land use case study-Eucalyptus crenulata, Yering. Report to Burnley Horticultural College, Victoria (unpubl.).
Other Links
Subscribe to receive EUCALYPTOLOGICS via RSS
© 2008 Gustavo Iglesias Trabado. Please contact us if you want to use all or part of this text and photography elsewhere. We like to share, but we do not like rudeness.
Posted by georgeinbandon,oregon on 2/25/2008, 2:08 pm, in reply to "American Plantsman Discovers Eucalyptus Hybrid (our Ian Barclay, of course!)"
ReplyDeletecongratz Ian and thanks for sharing Gus. btw, i thought that crosses between gunnii and dalrympleana were called E. x irbyii or is the name obsolete or my memory defective??
Posted by Gus on 2/26/2008, 2:58 am, in reply to "Re: American Plantsman Discovers Eucalyptus Hybrid (our Ian Barclay, of course!)"
ReplyDeleteJoseph Maiden says (by 1924) about E. irbyii (named by Baker & Smith, 1920):
"The type comes from Alma Tier, Interlaken, Tasmania, growing amongst E. Gunnii (L. G. Irby, now Conservator of Forests of that State) and so far it has not been found out of that island." (...) "Some of the fruits are so like the hemispherical form of E. Gunnii, that when the material was first collected it was placed tentatively with that species until other characters could be worked out, but it is, however, a much coarser plant morphologically than that species"
So it was a Tasmanian "non standard looking E. gunnii" that Mr. Llewellyn George Irby found and Baker & Smith described.
"from which species it differs in the physical features of its bark lacking the sweet nature of the sap of E. Gunnii, which can always be obtained by cutting the bark, and from which it derives its common name of “Cider Gum.” In foliage it is not unlike E. Dalyrmpleana J.H.M. Its affinities lie equally between E. viminalis, on the one hand, and E. Gunnii, on the other, so that, in a systematic arrangement, it might be placed between these two."
Maiden comments Baker & Smith's description of Irby's finding:
"Mr. L. G. Irby thought at first it was E. viminalis from the abnormal (juvenile, J.H.M.) leaves, but noted its differences in other respects from the normal material of that species collected in other localities in Tasmania during his trip. An exhaustive oil determination, made since publishing our Research on the Eucalypts of Tasmania in Journ. Roy. Soc. (Tas.), 1912, confirmed our suspicion that it was new. In that paper it was placed tentatively under E. viminalis. The chief specific differences from this latter are the broader abnormal (juvenile, J.H.M.) and normal leaves, both of which are much coarser than those of E. viminalis" (...) "The fruits are, however, identical in shape with those of E. Gunnii."
So George, I have no idea what it really was but it could easily have been:
- E. gunnii x dalrympleana
- E. gunnii x viminalis
There is an E. irbyi botanical plate by Margaret Flockton . There you can see it has juvenile "Gunnii-ish" leaves, but adult "Dalrympleana-ish" leaves.
What is sure is that sometime after Maiden writing that, the general belief was towards E. gunnii x dalrympleana. So soon afterwards, it moved from "E. irbyii" to "x E. irbyii", considered as hybrid.
Assuming it was an hybrid, in this case it was a natural cross, whatever the parents were. I rather consider the more modern French hybrids (man-made) as E. gundal. Because time and location differences for the different strains. Also because that is its commercial name. E. irbyii has been forgotten as time passed by (except by those liking the old stories ) :-)